A blog for Optotraffic
Header image

May 7: Recently, the well-respected Insurance  Institute for Highway Safety conducted a public opinion survey about red-light and speed cameras in Washington, DC, which has aggressive enforcement and relatively high fines. Here’s the link to the study: http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr042513.html

Some highlights of the findings:

  • 87% favor red-light camera enforcement and 76% support speed camera enforcement.
  • Just over half support adding cameras at stop signs and 47% support adding cameras at crosswalks. The percentages are much higher, however, among individuals who generally walk rather than drive.
  • 58% of the people surveyed had actually received citations generated by automated systems – primarily speed cameras. Of that number, 59% of people who received citations acknowledge that the citation was deserved.

January 7:  The Optotraffic team is committed to highway safety, particularly around schools.  That’s why we come to work each day. But, of course, getting positive feedback about our work is always appreciated. That’s why we were pleased to read the very positive report on our program in Prince George’s County, Maryland by the top news radio station in the region. It includes comments by AAA, an organization that has been critical  of automated speed enforcement in other jurisdictions. Here’s the link to that WTOP coverage: http://www.wtop.com/58/3178138/Study-Speed-cameras-slowing-down-Prince-Georges-drivers

October 15:  Optotraffic’s equipment is a major public safety tool in Prince George’s County, Maryland and, of course, accuracy is paramount for an automated speed enforcement system.  During the first year of deployments, more than 2500 calibration verification tests were conducted by police measuring the Optotraffic equipment against calibrated radar guns and calibrated speedometers in police vehicles.  In all tests before enforcement begins all three measurements must be within plus/minus one mile-per-hour of each other.  That’s accurate!

January 19: Recently, a representative from the Mid-Atlantic AAA called the District of Columbia a “speed trap” because it had deployed speed cameras at various locations.  Police Chief Cathy Lanier responded in the Washington Post saying, “I find it astounding that AAA Mid-Atlantic would criticize a program that has been successful in reducing traffic deaths”. She said further, “Additionally, we constantly receive requests from residents and council members for increased enforcement in their neighborhoods.”  Optotraffic certainly shares the Chief’s bewilderment with the AAA’s position.

In Maryland, laser sensor speed enforcement technology has taken speed monitoring to an advanced level of performance by addressing limitations of traditional radar-based speed cameras currently in use in many municipalities.

A recent study by Lanham-based Optotraffic – - which provides completely automated, high accuracy red light and speed enforcement solutions to Maryland jurisdictions, municipalities and towns – - found that only 57% of the violations of 10 mph or more over the speed limit could be enforced by radar, meaning that 43% would have to be thrown out.

Optotraffic  is the only provider that manufactures its own, state-of-the-art speed enforcement systems and the only one that develops its own software, regarded as the most comprehensive and efficient available. Other competitors typically provide equipment purchased by third party vendors, usually based on less current and less efficient technology.

The company’s units are calibrated daily and tested to within one mile per hour – - in annual tests by independent laboratories and periodically by the police departments of local municipalities.  This automated speed enforcement system measures the speeds of passing vehicles with an accuracy of +/- 1 mph. Less than 0.2% of all issued citations based on this company’s measurements have been contested in a court hearing.

For each of their laser speed sensor, the company employs two laser sensors, that use light detection and ranging technology in a “laser pointer type” fashion. These two beams, one further “downstream” from the other, are perpendicular to the lanes of traffic. Using laser beams, they precisely measure the presence of an object 10,000 times per second for as long as it takes to travel between the two.

The speed is precisely measured by the laser sensors from the time a vehicle encounters the first beam to the time it encounters the second beam. The units are calibrated daily, and are removed and tested annually in an independent testing lab. The speed of cars is not determined by cameras. It is determined solely by the laser ranging sensors. Still cameras are only used for identification and physical presence purposes, not for speed measurements.

Specifically, still cameras at each unit have only the following uses:

- to demonstrate that the vehicle was at the location where its speed could be measured;

- to identify the vehicle by looking at the license plate; and

- to demonstrate that the vehicle was actually in motion when it moved through the laser sensor system.